lizzard46 just registered.
Liisa just registered.
estrin2003 just registered.
poker_pros just registered.
drbob121313 just registered.
pchappert just registered.
longdic72 just registered.
Bratsell just registered.
alabama just registered.
cheapshoes1 just registered.
bill36 just registered.
"Amazon.com has vowed to fight on in the case, arguing it has a constitutional right to advertise and sell illegal animal fighting paraphernalia — a bizarre position that the publishers of "The Gamecock" magazine have now decided not to press in court, and which the Supreme Court unequivocally rejected in Williams by a 7-2 vote."
created Jun 08, 2008 by Jim Cowie
1 response
jhota
i would love to hear an explanation of Amazon's position - but at the same time, i have trouble with them being held accountable for the actions and editorial choices of the magazine's publishers. my question would be, is the magazine itself illegal? i realize the answer is probably yes - but it seems that Amazon isn't the one to go after. the publisher is.
Once registered, you can create your own stories. Click on the Post button to get started.
